The Execution Gap: Where Strategy Stalls and How to Fix It

by Kamaria Scott
May 16, 2025
Read time: 4 minutes

In this article: How to support managers when organizational change happens in whispers rather than announcements—and why transparent communication during transitions is critical for execution.

When change trickles down in whispers, not strategy.

Marcus noticed it first during the Monday leadership meeting. His boss kept checking her phone. The CFO mentioned "new priorities" without explaining what they were replacing. And when Marcus asked about the Q3 roadmap, he got a vague "we're still finalizing things."

By Wednesday, Marcus learned from his peer that two directors had been quietly moved to "special projects." By Friday, he was fielding questions from his team about rumors they'd heard, and he had no answers to give them.

Marcus wasn't dealing with announced change—he was navigating the kind of shift that happens in whispers, closed-door meetings, and unmistakable energy shifts.

There's a kind of change that doesn't come with an all-hands announcement. No town hall. No rollout plan. No bold strategy slide.

Just whispers. Closed-door meetings. And an unmistakable shift in energy.

Middle managers notice it first—because they're close enough to sense the cracks, but far enough from the top to be left guessing.

We don't talk enough about how destabilizing this kind of quiet restructuring can be for the people who are holding your teams together.

So let's talk about it.

When Change Is Whispered, Not Announced

Middle managers are often expected to interpret and translate change. But what happens when there's nothing to translate?

They see a reorg happen before it's announced. They lose access to decisions they once made. They're asked to reinforce "new priorities" with no explanation of where they came from.

They're not resisting change. They're navigating it without context and still trying to protect their teams in the process.

Here's the truth: Senior leaders often think they're protecting people by waiting to communicate until everything is "finalized." But this protective instinct actually creates more anxiety and confusion than transparency would.

It's not resistance. It's exhaustion.
It's not confusion. It's absence of clarity.
It's not disengagement. It's disorientation.

How Organizations Can Do Better

Tell the Truth Early (Even If It's Incomplete)

You don't need all the answers to be transparent. Saying "We're still working through the details, but here's what we know right now," goes a long way.

Uncertainty is hard. But secrecy is harder.

Give Managers the Language Before You Give Them the Task

Don't ask managers to "cascade" change they don't understand. Equip them with words, FAQs, talking points, or even a 10-minute huddle with context. Don't leave them to improvise with their teams' trust.

Make Space for Processing—Not Just Execution

Change doesn't just require direction. It requires sense-making. Give managers a forum to ask questions, surface what they're seeing, and process their own reactions. Don't make them do that privately, then show up publicly polished.

Check In Before You Check Out

When the pressure's on, it's easy for senior leaders to skip straight to business. But remember: your managers are both leaders and humans. Ask: "How are you doing with everything going on?"

Even one sentence can re-humanize the process.

Clarify What's Expected—Not Just What's Changing

When systems shift, people need to know what good looks like now. If decision-making authority changes, say that. If visibility expectations shift, say that. Don't assume people will read between the lines.

Why This Matters

Middle managers are the connective tissue of your organization. They carry culture, communication, and the emotional labor of every change effort. When they're left out or left behind, the whole system gets shaky.

This communication breakdown is one reason why traditional training approaches often fail. Without organizational support, even well-trained managers struggle to lead effectively through unclear change.

Quiet change leaves loud consequences.

Your middle managers will either become advocates for the change or casualties of it. The difference often comes down to how early and honestly you bring them into the conversation.

So if you're changing things behind the scenes, ask yourself: "Have we included the people we expect to lead this?"

Because the earlier you bring your managers into the conversation, the more equipped they are to lead it with integrity, clarity, and trust.

Try This: A 'What I Know, What I Need' Exercise

If you're a manager in the middle of a foggy transition, take 10 minutes to answer:

  • What do I know is changing?
  • What do I sense is changing, but haven't confirmed?
  • What do I need in order to lead well right now?

Bring this to your next check-in or leadership sync—and use it to advocate for clarity.

You're not asking for privileged information. You're asking for the context you need to do your job well.

The challenges described in this article are symptoms of missing manager support systems. If your organization is ready to move from hoping managers figure it out to actually enabling their success,

explore how MMOS creates the structure and clarity that makes change leadership sustainable.